2 PC's: one of them see, another no.
Posted: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:53 pm
Hello.
I've 2 PC's connected to middle home netword (~300 PC's). So, when i create remote iSCSI device on first (10.*.*.25, further - "1") on second (10.*.*.60, further - "2") it's seen normally, and i can work with it. BUT. When i try to do this contrariwise ( usin 2 as server) - Starport and Microsoft iSCSI Initiator just "don't see" it (standart message). And, yes, anyway i CAN connect from 1 to 2's server using starwind remote console, but no iSCSI connect in this direction, as i said...
No firewall installed on both pc's. Exceptions added for windows firewall (it's disabled too). Also disable in Windows 1394 fireware adapter on S (it was working, i thought it mixes interfaces). Also nothing... Systems fully optimized for it. The same OS (XP SP3) used, configured similary...
Port 3260 checked to be open both PC with nmap.
P.S. My PS's are connect to the switch by one cable which is seperated at the end (second PC use "reserve" "canal" of cable). Maybe in this can be the trouble?
Thanks in advance, Russ.
I've 2 PC's connected to middle home netword (~300 PC's). So, when i create remote iSCSI device on first (10.*.*.25, further - "1") on second (10.*.*.60, further - "2") it's seen normally, and i can work with it. BUT. When i try to do this contrariwise ( usin 2 as server) - Starport and Microsoft iSCSI Initiator just "don't see" it (standart message). And, yes, anyway i CAN connect from 1 to 2's server using starwind remote console, but no iSCSI connect in this direction, as i said...
No firewall installed on both pc's. Exceptions added for windows firewall (it's disabled too). Also disable in Windows 1394 fireware adapter on S (it was working, i thought it mixes interfaces). Also nothing... Systems fully optimized for it. The same OS (XP SP3) used, configured similary...
Port 3260 checked to be open both PC with nmap.
P.S. My PS's are connect to the switch by one cable which is seperated at the end (second PC use "reserve" "canal" of cable). Maybe in this can be the trouble?
Thanks in advance, Russ.