Is L2 cache now stable?

Software-based VM-centric and flash-friendly VM storage + free version

Moderators: anton (staff), art (staff), Max (staff), Anatoly (staff)

jhamm@logos-data.com
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:11 pm

Thu Sep 03, 2015 12:08 pm

Thanks Tera,

So to summarize, in the current production build:

1) L2 Cache with Thick Image file is stable

2) L2 Cache with LSFS is not 100% stable

3) LSFS without L2 Cache is stable

Is that correct?
Tarass (Staff)

Mon Sep 07, 2015 8:34 am

1) yes
2) yes
3) in a week
jhamm@logos-data.com
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:11 pm

Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:57 am

Since #2 (L2 Cache with LSFS) is not 100% stable, which one of the remaining ones will give better performance?

1) Thick Image File with L2 cache?

OR

3) LSFS without L2 cache?

Thanks!
Jeff
jhamm@logos-data.com
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:11 pm

Tue Sep 08, 2015 2:59 am

PS - I know the LSFS fix is in the build about to be released, but any timetable on when LSFS with L2 Cache enabled will be stable?
User avatar
darklight
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:04 pm

Fri Sep 11, 2015 8:46 am

Thick is proven to be rock solid for me almost in any situations. So if you do not need dedupe, use thick.
User avatar
Tarass (Staff)
Staff
Posts: 113
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2014 10:40 am

Tue Sep 29, 2015 12:49 pm

Any other questions left regarding this?
Senior Technical Support Engineer
StarWind Software Inc.
jhamm@logos-data.com
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:11 pm

Tue Sep 29, 2015 1:06 pm

Yes - still have my two previous questions:

1) Better performance from:
a. LSFS without L2 cache?
OR
b. Thick Image with L2 cache enabled?


2) Timetable on new build release?

Thanks!
jhamm@logos-data.com
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:11 pm

Thu Oct 08, 2015 2:44 pm

Tera,

Can you or someone else at StarWind have an answer for these performance questions? Really hard to plan and implement a new HA system unless we know the best and StarWind recommended route to go. My project is on hold until then. Really need to get it started.

Thanks,
Jeff
User avatar
darklight
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:04 pm

Fri Oct 09, 2015 9:27 am

Hi Jhamm,

I would strictly recommend using a thick image unless you have some *really* slow drives. It's just more predictable at least for me. And L2 cache works perfect with thick provisioned devices.

Yeah, we are all waiting for a new build. It seems StarWind guys did a great job and implemented a lot of new stuff in it since i do not remember any other previous build that needed so much testing :)
User avatar
darklight
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:04 pm

Fri Oct 09, 2015 9:29 am

Thick with L2 is faster than LSFS without it. Just did a small testing on my production environment.
jhamm@logos-data.com
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:11 pm

Wed Oct 14, 2015 2:05 pm

StarWind - any update on when you think the new build will be available? I thought it was supposed to have been released in September? It's really hard to plan implementations when we don't have a firm idea when to expect updates.

Thanks!
Jeff
Vladislav (Staff)
Staff
Posts: 180
Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2015 4:31 pm

Tue Oct 20, 2015 10:16 am

Hello,

Unfortunately, our new R3 build is still under heavy testing.

Nevertheless, I will be more than happy to share one of our pre-release builds to those who would like to try it out. Please note, that it is not considered as stable.
jhamm@logos-data.com
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:11 pm

Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:12 am

darklight - what build are you currently using in Production?

Thanks,
Jeff
User avatar
darklight
Posts: 185
Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2015 2:04 pm

Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:30 am

Hi Jeff,

Currently upgraded most of my customers to the latest one. No issues so far with flat devices and both types of cache.
jhamm@logos-data.com
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 10:11 pm

Tue Oct 20, 2015 11:43 am

Is build 8198 from June 11th the latest one?
Post Reply