Page 1 of 1

FCoE initiator request

Posted: Thu Sep 05, 2013 3:07 pm
by catalin.bostan
We have a problem regarding connection between FCoE initiator and COMSTAR FCoE target.
Frame size is to small and after mapping LUN , when i try to format hdd , storage crash with reference to:

NOTICE: fcoet1 LINK UP, portid fffffe, topology Direct Pt-to-Pt,speed 10G
Jul 28 03:14:34 prosystestsrv unix: [ID 836849 kern.notice]
Jul 28 03:14:34 prosystestsrv ^Mpanic[cpu5]/thread=ffffff003e2b6c40:
Jul 28 03:14:34 prosystestsrv genunix: [ID 143394 kern.notice] Unexpected xfer completion task ffffff090f861000 dbuf ffffff09785bfe80
Jul 28 03:14:34 prosystestsrv unix: [ID 100000 kern.notice]
Jul 28 03:14:34 prosystestsrv genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff003e2b6a80 stmf:stmf_data_xfer_done+243 ()
Jul 28 03:14:34 prosystestsrv genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff003e2b6ad0 fct:fct_scsi_data_xfer_done+96 ()
Jul 28 03:14:34 prosystestsrv genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff003e2b6b10 fcoet:fcoet_process_sol_fcp_data+12e ()
Jul 28 03:14:34 prosystestsrv genunix: [ID 655072 kern.notice] ffffff003e2b6b30 fcoet:fcoet_rx_frame+10d ()

Can you provide Packet Data size setting up to 15500?
seems to be limited now at 1408

Re: FCoE initiator request

Posted: Fri Sep 06, 2013 9:42 am
by Anatoly (staff)
Hi!

Unfortunately,this is impossible for now, but we will definitely add it in future release.

Re: FCoE initiator request

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 5:09 pm
by catalin.bostan
any update?
10x

Re: FCoE initiator request

Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 8:08 pm
by anton (staff)
FCoE is dead. There would be no updates.
catalin.bostan wrote:any update?
10x

Re: FCoE initiator request

Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 6:33 pm
by catalin.bostan
Hello Anton,

I think problem with FCoE initiator was resolved by someone else..

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.sola ... neral/6902

If you have no more interest in supporting FCoE , maybe you can open source code :) for us to fix and use.

Anyway , thank you

Re: FCoE initiator request

Posted: Thu Oct 30, 2014 10:44 pm
by anton (staff)
Keeping in mind VMware is concentrating on object storage (feeding storage directly to VM bypassing block level and file system) and Microsoft does SMB3 and sees SMB3 as a future of a VM storage we can technically consider FCoE as a dead cow now. I don't know will we open our initiator and open source it (I doubt...) but we're definitely not going to invest anything into FCoE so far.
catalin.bostan wrote:Hello Anton,

I think problem with FCoE initiator was resolved by someone else..

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.os.sola ... neral/6902

If you have no more interest in supporting FCoE , maybe you can open source code :) for us to fix and use.

Anyway , thank you