Could you please share the scripts you share and the logs? Please also let me know running which script is causing an issue. AFAIK, changing the key alone should not cause an issue. It's quite difficult to share logs and scripts through the forum. Here you are a gdrive link. I sent you pm with the ...

Delay isn't a prob at all. What's the most important it's a helpfulness. Thank you for the effort. I've changed the key and after a while after a service restart all replications jobs have stoped with an error "Uploading failed." Everifing loking good at Starwind UI but another issue has r...

Yaroslav, are you an AI-agent? Try restarting the service. I wrote I tried and it doesn"t work! The tape upload takes time. What you see in UI is the tape uploading, not its chunk. Find the balance between upload size and the number of operations. I can't advise on that as it is a purely empiri...

Have you tried to read and understand my questions? I guess no becase your last answers is out of relevance. I really need help please try to read first. Once again I have two urgent question and the others may faced with the same: 1. How to cancel the stuck replication jobs? 2. I have tapes the siz...

The size is imposed during tapes' creation, and you can split it in the config.json file. Try restarting StarWindService. Dear Yaroslav, but it was your advise to increase the block size at config.json file in order to decrease the number of put blob operations. Please see the previous posts. I sti...

Hi. As we discussed previously I have changed "AzurePartSizeMb": "1024" in StarWind\CloudReplicator\config.json and have got an issue during replication. The replication started but has never finished. As I can see in the log it try to operate by a different part size "Calcu...

Thanks, everything is clear but I have a mess with one question: I asked previously: using VTL to upload/download tape to/from Azure it uses much many write/read operation in comparison to make the same operation by web gui. I have a chart to compare it if you will need. It just the question of mone...

Hi. Thank you for the feedback. 1. I don't know what do you mean then talk about support of immutable storage. I meant just a deletion errors handling for whatever reason they arise whether because of a storage immutability or any other reason. 2. There no such variable in VTLReplicationSetting.ps. ...

VTL tapes are not immutable by design. So, is your request about introducing immutability on the VTL level? Not exactly, I can and I do a tape immutability at Azure level using retention policy but VTL doesn't see it and doesn't check so when VTL issue a deletion command it doesn't report about an ...

Hi guys. Finally I've managed to make some tests and can proof that your VTL software works with Azure archive storage as I asked about (it writes directly to archive tier and rehydrate data directly to hot tier). I have to stated everything works flawlessly, it's a state of art :) Meanwhile I have ...

Guys,

it looks like you drop down your VTL product. The latest release was in 2021. Is it truth or we cat expect future releases?

As of me I really need an optimal restore process from Azure Archive tire storage.

Ahaha... LOL. "Version 8 (build 14033) Release Notes MS Azure support: Added the option to upload virtual files to Archive tier directly without uploading to Hot/Cool tier and then moving it to Archive tier in the cloud." Guys, whether you have been writing a wrong code for a year or someo...

Hi, Yes, I do. Here is what they said I believe that is the way StarWind Cloud Replicator works. Transferring from archive straight to hot costed more than moving data to cold tier as intermediate when the solution was designed. That's a delusion! Here you are https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure...

Do you have any feedback from R&D team? If you need I can proof that an archive->hot tier recover process is more cost efficient than the others.

Can I expect to see new features in the next release? Next August?

Super, thanks. We're all in profit from such collaboration.

But such modification of AddVirtualTape script doesn't affect an automatic tape creation after the export.