Hi, can anyone confirm if this degradation of performance (between local storage vs. storage presented via a starwind cluster) is to be expected in the current production version of starwind? as I was getting 100k iops and 900MB/s off the local storage (5 drive SSD Array), I would have expected two ...

that would be the example #1 I showed of the performance of the D: drive. (if you look a few comments up in the thread, you can see all the servers are identical in spec)

Thanks

Thank you for the response, that is how I ended up creating the HA of an LSFS volume, however I wasn't sure if all of the active/active performance features would be active in that case. Speaking of performance, so far, what I'm seeing is pretty disappointing. I have two of the above mentioned serve...

Hi, I'm also curious about the purpose of the .swdsk file that is created with an LSFS storage device. The file isn't locked, so can be deleted (where as the .spsp file and .spspx file are locked). What are the ramifications if the .swdsk file were to be deleted from the disk subsystem?

So, as my previous post indicated, I have just installed this software. I setup a cluster and created a clustered device.. there are no LSFS options for clustered devices? (IE no HA for your new LSFS??) There are no thin provisioning options for clustered devices? (no thin provisioning if using a HA...

Hello, I have just installed the latest build of Starwind from your website. This is a new install that we are testing for potential purchase. 3 Servers: Dual Proc Xeon Server 2012 R2 64GB RAM dual SSD's in Raid 1 for OS 5 SSD's in Raid 0 for Starwind HA Server Cluster (2.1TB) My question is with re...